Data report

State of AI Use Cases

What 1377 documented AI deployments across 257 use cases say about where AI runs, how far it acts on its own, and how often organizations prove the result.

Computed live from the library on 3 October 2026. By Len Debets.

1377
Deployments
1141 organizations in 72 countries
60%
Disclose an outcome
Of 1377 public deployments, a measurable result
63%
Agentic
Of 1377 public deployments, the AI completes work itself
257
Use cases
Canonical pages, each with evidence and a playbook

Finding 1: most AI results are claimed, few are proven

60% (n=1377) of public deployments disclose a measurable outcome. Of the 872 reported metrics, 56% come from vendors and 44% from the deploying organization itself.

Who made the claim (reported metrics)
  • Vendor
    490
  • Organization
    380
  • Independent
    2
Evidence grade of deployment records
  • Grade C
    788
  • Grade B
    583
  • Grade A
    4
  • Grade D
    2

Finding 2: AI is moving from answering to acting

63% (n=1377) of public deployments belong to use cases where the AI completes work itself (a supervised or autonomous agent, or an agentic workflow), rather than only assisting a person.

Use cases by autonomy level
  • Supervised agent
    103
  • Copilot
    87
  • Assist
    51
  • Autonomous
    16
Deployments by stage
  • Production
    838
  • Scaled
    298
  • Pilot
    146
  • Announced
    83
  • Paused or rolled back
    12

Finding 3: where the evidence is

Public deployments by industry of the deploying organization, with the share that disclosed an outcome, and by region.

Public deployments by industry
Public deployments by region
  • North America
    681
  • Europe
    349
  • Asia Pacific
    163
  • Global
    89
  • Middle East
    38
  • Latin America
    36
  • Africa
    21

Finding 4: the building blocks

The AI patterns use cases are built from, and how the EU AI Act classifies them.

The benchmarks with the most evidence

KPIs with at least three pooled public values across the whole library ("up to" values are listed on each KPI page, not pooled).

Benchmarks with the most public data points
KPIMedianReported rangeData pointsClaimed by
Cycle time reduction55.5%
7% to 97%
Not pooled: up to 70%, up to 70%, up to 30%, up to 20%
50plus 4 up to21 organization, 29 vendor
Productivity gain50%
8.7% to 113%
Not pooled: up to 90%, up to 87.5%, up to 80%, up to 30%, up to 16%
40plus 5 up to15 organization, 25 vendor
Handling time reduction61.5%
8.2% to 97%
Not pooled: up to 85%, up to 67%, up to 50%, up to 20%, up to 5%
36plus 5 up to11 organization, 25 vendor
Automation rate80%
25% to 99%
Not pooled: up to 70%, up to 50%
37plus 2 up to13 organization, 24 vendor
Accuracy91%
42% to 100%
Not pooled: up to 99%, up to 90%
33plus 2 up to18 organization, 15 vendor
Containment rate61.5%
20% to 99.6%
Not pooled: up to 88.5%
28plus 1 up to12 organization, 16 vendor
Cost reduction45%
2% to 95%
Not pooled: up to 70%, up to 70%
20plus 2 up to7 organization, 13 vendor
Employee adoption82%
30% to 100%
175 organization, 12 vendor

About this report

Every figure is computed from the public records in the library at the date above, using the rules on the methodology page. The underlying data is available as open data under CC BY 4.0. The sample reflects what organizations choose to publish, which skews toward large organizations and successful projects.