Mergers & acquisitions

Close deals faster, with fewer surprises. AI for due diligence, valuation analysis, and integration planning.

Due diligence
Valuation analysis
Integration planning

Where deal teams lose time

Speed and accuracy decide most deals. These six steps are where both tend to slip.

Due diligence complexity

Reviewing thousands of documents by hand slows the deal and raises the odds of missing something critical.

  • Automated document analysis
  • Risk identification and scoring
  • Contract analysis and review

Valuation accuracy

Getting the price right means pulling market data, running comparables and working through several valuation models.

  • AI powered valuation models
  • Market comparables analysis
  • Financial performance forecasting

Integration planning

A sound integration plan means mapping two sets of systems, processes, and cultures before day one.

  • System compatibility analysis
  • Process mapping and optimization
  • Integration roadmap planning

Regulatory compliance

Every deal must clear complex regulatory requirements, often in several jurisdictions at once.

  • Regulatory requirement analysis
  • Compliance risk assessment
  • Approval process automation

Data integration

Two companies means two sets of databases, with different formats and different ideas of what clean data looks like.

  • Data mapping and transformation
  • Data quality assessment
  • Master data management

Timeline pressure

Deal timelines are tight. Your team needs fast analysis and fast decisions without cutting corners.

  • Faster analysis cycles
  • Real time collaboration tools
  • Automated reporting and dashboards

AI use cases for deal teams, and how we build them on Blits.ai

Six use cases that legal and deal teams already run in production: what each one does, how we build it on the Blits.ai platform, and what it can be worth for a firm or legal team of a given size.

Deal sourcing and due diligence

AI deal sourcing and due diligence is an AI assistant that screens the market for acquisition or investment targets and speeds up due diligence for a deal team. It builds company profiles, reads data room documents, extracts key terms and risks, and drafts the investment or diligence memo, for the team to verify and decide.

Built withAgentic AI
USD 135,000 to USD 1.1 million
Deal team time released in due diligence, per year. Reference: A mid market private equity firm that takes 15 companies a year into full due diligence.
How we build it on Blits.ai

On Blits.ai this is an agentic workflow with human in the loop approval. For sourcing, the agent uses the built in web search and web page browsing tools, custom functions that call the firm's licensed data providers and SQL knowledge bases over the deal pipeline and past deal records, and writes company profiles as structured output for the deal team. For diligence, data room exports and past memos go into a knowledge base that ingests PDF, Word, Excel and Outlook email files, and the agent answers from passages found with hybrid retrieval. The prompt and flow design require a citation to the source document for every statement.

A flow drives the key terms checklist deal by deal, and the agent drafts findings and the memo in the firm's template, which the team reviews and completes. Tenant isolation keeps the firm's data apart from other customers. With a separate bot and knowledge base per deal, role based access with per bot roles limits who sees which deal.

PII masking hides personal data at the gateway, a per tenant audit log records user actions, and input and output guardrails screen for prompt injection attempts. Test suites replay questions on closed deals after every change, and the platform is model agnostic. Run Blits.ai in our cloud in the EU, Qatar, Singapore, the UAE, the US or Australia, in your private cloud, or fully on premises, so the firm can choose where its deal data is processed.

See the 6 public deployments

Procurement and contract review

Procurement and contract review is an assistant that reads supplier contracts and proposals, for procurement and vendor management teams. It extracts the key terms, flags deviations from the organization's standard positions, drafts requests for proposal and evaluation matrices, and prepares negotiation positions, with a procurement or legal owner approving every conclusion.

USD 75,600 to USD 640,000
Review time released plus savings on tail spend, per year. Reference: A bank with 2,000 supplier contracts and 400 new contracts or renewals reviewed a year.
How we build it on Blits.ai

On Blits.ai this is an AI agent with a knowledge base holding the clause playbook, regulatory clause lists, templates and past tenders, retrieved with hybrid search. Contracts and proposals arrive as uploads or through incoming email as a knowledge source, and document ingestion reads PDF, DOCX, image and Outlook email files. An agentic workflow extracts the key terms with structured output, compares them with the playbook, and writes the record back to the contract system through custom functions (REST calls), connectors from the integration catalog (for example SAP, Oracle, NetSuite, DocuSign) or the ready made SharePoint tool.

Buyers and lawyers work with the agent in Microsoft Teams or email, and write backs and outgoing redlines are set to require human in the loop approval. Input and output guardrails block prompt injection attempts, PII masking protects personal data in contracts, run history with a full audit trail keeps each extraction and approval, and test suites check extraction accuracy on a reference set of contracts after every change. The platform is model agnostic. Run Blits.ai in our cloud in the EU, Qatar, Singapore, the UAE, the US or Australia, in your private cloud, or fully on premises.

See the 10 public deployments

Legal research and drafting

A legal research and drafting assistant is a generative AI tool that finds and summarizes case law and legislation for lawyers, answering legal questions with citations. It works for lawyers in firms, legal departments and public bodies, also searching internal know how and drafting first versions of memos, briefings, letters and filings, which the lawyer verifies and signs off.

Built withChatbots
USD 450,000 to USD 3 million
Lawyer time released, per year. Reference: A law firm or legal department with 100 lawyers.

Employee adoption: median 80%, reported by 5 public deployments.

How we build it on Blits.ai

On Blits.ai this is an AI agent with a knowledge base that holds the organization's precedents, practice notes and matter documents, retrieved with hybrid retrieval (vector and BM25) so exact statutory references and case names are found, and answering with the retrieved passages. Licensed legal databases and the document management system can be connected as tools through custom functions or MCP servers, and the agent is instructed to refuse when retrieval finds nothing. It runs inside Microsoft Teams or an internal web app through the REST API.

Longer tasks, such as extracting defined points from a set of documents into a table, run as an agentic workflow with structured output and an audit trail per run. PII masking at the gateway and role based access control protect client data, and the platform is model agnostic, so the legal team can compare models on its own test questions. Run Blits.ai in our cloud in the EU, Qatar, Singapore, the UAE, the US or Australia, in your private cloud, or fully on premises. Test suites with lawyer written questions and expected authorities catch regressions when prompts, content or models change.

See the 13 public deployments

Lease abstraction

AI lease abstraction reads a commercial lease, amendment or letter of intent and pulls out the key terms into structured data for property owners, occupiers and brokerages. The terms include parties, dates, rent, escalations, options and renewal notices, so nobody has to retype every clause by hand into the lease administration and portfolio systems.

Built withAgentic AI
USD 400,000 to USD 9 million
Lease abstraction labor cost avoided, per year. Reference: A commercial real estate services firm abstracting 10,000 leases and LOIs a year.
How we build it on Blits.ai

On Blits.ai, lease abstraction runs as an AI agent with structured output configuration, so the model returns each document's fields, such as dates, rent and escalations, as machine readable data instead of prose. A knowledge base ingests lease PDFs and images of exhibits and amendments, and a small, scoped set of custom functions writes the confirmed fields into the organization's lease or portfolio management system through its API, once a person has reviewed the fields the model flagged as an exception.

The same knowledge base, retrieved with hybrid search, powers a conversational assistant that answers questions about a specific lease or compares draft letters of intent, in the employee's own language. Test suites regress extraction accuracy on a fixed set of leases before every change, full execution tracing lets a reviewer inspect every agent turn behind an abstract, with token counts and trace details, and the platform is model agnostic, so a firm can route extraction to a different provider without rebuilding the workflow.

See the 10 public deployments

eDiscovery document review

AI for eDiscovery and disclosure document review sorts, prioritizes and codes large collections of emails, chats and files for relevance, issues and legal privilege. It works across litigation, investigations and regulatory requests, so lawyers review the documents most likely to matter and can show the court how the rest were handled.

Built withAI Platform
USD 225,000 to USD 1.5 million
First pass review cost avoided, per year. Reference: A litigation or investigations team that reviews 1 million documents a year.
How we build it on Blits.ai

Blits.ai is not a review platform, so the review itself stays in the organization's eDiscovery tool. What can be built on Blits.ai is the layer around it: an agentic workflow that takes a batch of extracted document text through the REST API, asks an agent with a versioned prompt and structured output for a relevance call, the issues touched and a rationale per document, and writes the result back through custom functions, with a full audit trail per run and human in the loop approval before any bulk coding is applied.

PII masking at the gateway limits the personal data the model sees, and the platform is model agnostic, so the team can compare models on the same instructions. Run Blits.ai in our cloud in the EU, Qatar, Singapore, the UAE, the US or Australia, in your private cloud, or fully on premises to keep the data in region. Test suites with lawyer coded documents act as a regression set when the instructions change, and a knowledge base with the review protocol and issue definitions lets reviewers ask questions about the matter's rules while they work.

See the 5 public deployments

Contract obligation tracking

Contract obligation tracking uses AI to extract commitments and deadlines from signed contracts, keep them in one register and alert the owner before a deadline is missed. The commitments include service levels, renewal and notice dates, price escalators, audit rights and delivery milestones.

USD 45,000 to USD 6.8 million
Estimated exposure from missed contractual obligations avoided, per year. Reference: An organization managing 3,000 active supplier and customer contracts.
How we build it on Blits.ai

On Blits.ai this is an AI agent with a knowledge base holding the contract estate, ingested through document upload or incoming email as a knowledge source, with document ingestion reading PDF, DOCX and image contracts. An agentic workflow extracts obligations with structured output, links amendments to their master agreement, and writes the obligation register through custom functions (REST calls) or connectors from the integration catalog (for example SAP or Oracle); a contract lifecycle management system is reached through custom functions, and DocuSign is a listed connector for picking up newly executed agreements.

A scheduled agentic workflow (or an agentic task with scheduled rechecks) runs the reminder and escalation logic, notifying owners through email or Microsoft Teams, with unanswered alerts escalating to a second owner. Guardrails provide input and output checks on the assistant's interactions, including a platform default that blocks prompt injection attempts, automatic PII masking at the gateway limits personal data exposure in those interactions, and run history with a full audit trail keeps every extraction, confirmation and alert.

Test suites check extraction accuracy on a reference set of contracts and amendments after every change. The platform is model agnostic. Run Blits.ai in our cloud in the EU, Qatar, Singapore, the UAE, the US or Australia, in your private cloud, or fully on premises.

See the 3 public deployments

What matters when a deal team puts AI on a data room

Deal data is confidential, often price sensitive, and a single finding can change the purchase agreement. These are the questions deal counsel, compliance and IT ask, and how Blits.ai answers them.

Regulations these use cases are mapped to in our AI Use Case Library

Inside information stays inside the deal

A live deal is often inside information under the EU Market Abuse Regulation, so access has to follow the insider list. With a separate bot and knowledge base per deal and role based access per bot, only the people on a deal see its documents, and tenant isolation keeps your data apart from other customers.

A source for every finding

Diligence findings end up in memos, disclosure letters and price talks, so each one must trace back to a document. The assistant answers from the data room and your past memos, cites the source document for every statement and says so when it finds nothing. Test suites replay questions on closed deals after every change.

Regulators and AI rules

AI on a deal falls under the rules for any system that handles deal data: the EU AI Act for how it is classified and documented, GDPR and UK GDPR for personal data in the data room, and DORA where the buyer is a financial entity. An audit log and run history show what the AI did.

Guardrails on every document and answer

A data room holds documents written by the other side. Input and output guardrails screen every message for prompt injection attempts and policy breaches, and PII masking at the gateway hides names, contact details and other personal data before a model sees them.

Deal data stays where you decide

Run Blits.ai in our cloud in the EU, Qatar, Singapore, the UAE, the US or Australia, in your private cloud, or fully on premises, including air gapped environments. The platform is model agnostic, so you choose which model processes deal data, and it is ISO 27001, ISO 42001, SOC 2 Type II and PCI DSS Level 1 certified.

The deal team decides

Findings and memos come out in your own template, and the team reviews and completes them. Agentic workflows wait for human approval before anything is written back to a system or sent out. Price, structure and the decision to sign stay with the people who own the deal; the AI prepares the work.

What legal teams achieve with AI

Across 106 public AI deployments in legal work at 95 organizations in 17 countries, these are the results they report.

80%

Employee adoption

median across 5 public deployments

39.5%

Productivity gain

median across 4 public deployments

90%

Accuracy

median across 3 public deployments

Figures are reported by the organizations themselves or their technology vendors and checked in the Blits.ai AI Use Case Library, where each use case page lists the organizations and sources. Explore all 19 use cases in the AI Use Case Library.

Send us the deal step that eats your weeks

We'll demo it working on that step, and it can be in production within weeks.

Frequently asked questions

The numbers behind the shift

Market context, with sources. The opportunity is real, and so is the risk of getting it wrong.

95%
of enterprise generative AI pilots deliver no measurable impact on the P&L, so execution and the right use case matter more than the model
Source: MIT report (via Fortune)
30%+
of generative AI projects were expected to be abandoned after proof of concept by the end of 2025, which is why a productized, tailored platform beats a bespoke build
Source: Gartner
two thirds
of all customer service chats handled by Klarna's AI assistant in its first month, doing the work of 700 agents
Source: Klarna