KPI benchmark

How much better does AI detect fraud and risk?

Across 4 public AI deployments, the median detection improvement is 82.5%. Increase in genuine fraud, risk or defects detected.

82.5%

Median detection improvement

4

Public deployments pooled

1 of the 4 values are claims by the organization itself, a regulator or an independent study; 3 come from the AI vendor. One value per organization; "up to" claims are listed but not pooled. Data as of 27 September 2026. Methodology

Detection improvement by industry

Median detection improvement by industry
IndustryMedianDeployments
Banking135%3

How to measure it

True positives detected per period or recall on a labeled sample, before and after.

Across the library

Median 82.5% across 4 deployments, reported range 25% to 300%.

Median 5x across 3 deployments, reported range 2.5x to 14x, plus 1 "up to" value not pooled.

Higher is better. Unit: percent.

Reported values by use case

Use cases that should track detection improvement

Frequently asked questions

How much better does AI detect fraud and risk?
Across 4 public AI deployments, the median detection improvement is 82.5%. Increase in genuine fraud, risk or defects detected.
How do you measure detection improvement?
True positives detected per period or recall on a labeled sample, before and after.
What detection improvement do organizations in banking report?
A median of 135% across 3 deployments in banking. Other industries have fewer than 3 reported values so far.
Where do these detection improvement numbers come from?
From public AI deployments in the Blits.ai AI Use Case Library. Every value is quoted from a named source, each organization counts once, and "up to" claims are listed but left out of the median. Data as of 27 September 2026.