[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":579},["ShallowReactive",2],{"uc-board-and-committee-paper-summarization":3,"uc-regulations":358},{"useCase":4,"evidence":170,"blitsAiDeployments":256,"benchmarks":257,"indicative":258,"related":261,"indexability":356,"includeUnpublished":176},{"title":5,"shortTitle":6,"seoTitle":7,"metaDescription":8,"status":9,"definition":10,"aliases":11,"industries":17,"functions":20,"patterns":24,"channels":27,"audience":29,"autonomy":30,"adoptionStage":31,"segment":32,"problem":33,"problemStats":34,"howItWorks":35,"valueDrivers":36,"kpis":40,"indicativeValue":43,"macroEstimates":79,"feasibility":80,"implementation":91,"risk":133,"blitsAi":148,"faq":150,"related":163,"datePublished":165,"dateModified":165,"lastVerified":165,"changelog":166,"slug":169},"AI for board and committee paper summarization","Board paper summarization","AI board pack summary for directors","AI summarizes board and committee papers so directors arrive prepared. Diligent case studies at Sagic and Canadian Light Source show it.","published","An AI assistant that reads board and committee papers before a meeting and gives each director a short, cited briefing. The briefing covers what changed since last time, the decisions being asked of the board, the risks flagged and the open questions worth raising, with page references back to the source pack.",[12,13,14,15,16],"AI board pack summary","board book summarization","board paper briefing assistant","committee paper summarization AI","AI board prep assistant",[18,19],"cross-industry","insurance",[21,22,23],"legal","knowledge-management","risk-management",[25,26],"summarization","document-processing",[28],"internal-tools","employee-facing","assist","early-adopters","governance","Board packs keep growing thicker. Every paper, appendix and prior minute gets attached, and a\ndirector sitting on several boards receives several of these before every meeting cycle. Reading\nthem properly, cross referencing what changed since the last paper, and preparing questions takes\nhours that come out of a director's own time.\n\nWhen preparation is rushed, the risk goes beyond a weaker meeting. A director who skims the pack\narrives without the context to challenge management, misses a change buried on page eighty, or asks\na question already answered in the appendix. The company secretary or general counsel who assembles\nthe pack has no easy way to tell whether directors actually engaged with what was sent, only whether\nit was delivered.",[],"1. **Ingest the pack.** The board portal receives the agenda, papers, appendices and prior minutes\n   for the meeting, kept in the version directors will actually read.\n2. **Summarize per paper.** For each agenda item the AI produces a short summary: what is being\n   asked of the board, what changed since the last paper on the same topic, and the numbers and\n   risks that matter, each with a page reference into the source document.\n3. **Draft prep questions.** From the summary and the paper's own risk language, the AI drafts a\n   short list of questions a prepared director might raise, for the director to use, skip or\n   replace.\n4. **Scan for exposure.** A separate pass flags risky language, unclear commitments or wording that\n   could create legal exposure, for the company secretary or general counsel to review before the\n   pack goes out.\n5. **Keep the packet next to the summary.** Directors read the AI briefing alongside the original\n   pack, and the AI makes no recommendation on how the board should decide.\n6. **Summarize the outcome.** After the meeting, the discussion and decisions can feed the minutes,\n   which stay a separate, board approved record.",[37,38,39],"employee-productivity","speed","compliance",[41,42],"time-saved-per-task","hours-saved",{"referenceOrg":44,"inputs":45,"formula":74,"currency":75,"period":76,"resultLabel":77,"caveat":78},"A company with a 10 person board and 8 board and committee meetings a year",[46,53,60,67],{"key":47,"label":48,"low":49,"high":50,"unit":51,"note":52},"directors","Directors and committee members reading the pack",8,15,"people","Editorial assumption. Replace with your own board and committee membership.",{"key":54,"label":55,"low":56,"high":57,"unit":58,"note":59},"meetingsPerYear","Board and committee meetings per year",6,10,"meetings per year","Editorial assumption for a company with a board and two or three standing committees.",{"key":61,"label":62,"low":63,"high":64,"unit":65,"note":66},"hoursSavedPerMeeting","Preparation time saved per director per meeting",1,3,"hours per meeting","Editorial assumption, replace with your own. The cited case studies report faster, more confident preparation but gives no quantified before and after figure for hours saved.",{"key":68,"label":69,"low":70,"high":71,"unit":72,"note":73},"hourlyValue","Value of a director's or committee member's time",150,400,"USD per hour","Editorial assumption. Replace with your own board's fee rate or opportunity cost.","directors * meetingsPerYear * hoursSavedPerMeeting * hourlyValue","USD","per year","Director and committee preparation time released","Values director time at an assumed rate and leaves out the company secretary's or general counsel's own time preparing and reviewing the pack, the cost of the board portal, and the harder to price value of sharper questions and fewer risks missed on page eighty.",[],{"complexity":81,"complexityNote":82,"dataPrerequisites":83,"integrations":87},"low","Board portals already hold the pack in one place, so summarization can start as a portal feature with little new integration. A company secretary will keep reading every paper after a summary exists, so trust has to be earned, and directors need to see the source page behind every claim.",[84,85,86],"A board portal or repository holding the current and prior board and committee packs","A definition of which papers, committees and meeting types the assistant may summarize","Confidentiality rules for papers under legal privilege or that concern a named individual",[88,89,90],"Board management or governance platform (the pack repository)","Minutes and action tracking system","Document management system for source papers and appendices",{"steps":92,"guardrails":108,"humanInTheLoop":114,"kpisToInstrument":115,"failureModes":120},[93,96,99,102,105],{"title":94,"detail":95},"Start with one committee","Pick a committee with a heavy pack, such as risk or audit, and run AI summaries alongside the normal pack for a full cycle before offering it board wide.",{"title":97,"detail":98},"Require a page reference on every line","A summary is only useful if a director can find the source in seconds. Every summarized point cites the paper and page it came from.",{"title":100,"detail":101},"Keep the risk scan separate from the summary","Flagging risky language for the company secretary or general counsel to fix before distribution is a different job from briefing directors after distribution. Do not conflate the two passes.",{"title":103,"detail":104},"Never let the summary replace the pack","Position the briefing as a companion a director reads first. Directors remain accountable for their own preparation.",{"title":106,"detail":107},"Set confidentiality rules before rollout","Papers under legal privilege, personnel matters or matters concerning a named individual may need to be excluded from AI processing or handled by a smaller, separately configured instance.",[109,110,111,112,113],"Every summarized point cites the source paper and page number","The AI drafts prep questions and flags risky language; it never recommends how the board should decide","Sensitive committee papers (remuneration involving named individuals, legal privilege, live disputes) follow a separate policy on whether AI may process them at all","The original pack stays the board's record; the AI briefing is a companion document","Board and committee data stays within the organization's chosen region and is not used to train external models","The company secretary or general counsel decides which packs and committees use AI summarization, reviews risk scan flags before the pack is distributed, and remains accountable for the pack's accuracy. Directors decide how much weight to give the AI briefing; nothing in it substitutes for reading the paper or for the board's own judgment.",[116,117,118,119],"Director reported preparation time per meeting, before and after","Pack length and summary length per committee","Risk scan flags raised before distribution and how many led to a change","Director survey on meeting quality and confidence in preparation",[121,124,127,130],{"title":122,"detail":123},"A missed nuance in a dense paper","A summary smooths over a qualification or a dissenting view buried in an appendix. Keep the page citation on every point so a director can check anything that looks important.",{"title":125,"detail":126},"Directors stop reading the pack","A good summary can become a substitute for the paper. Track whether directors still open source documents and say so explicitly in board induction.",{"title":128,"detail":129},"Sensitive papers processed by default","A committee paper naming an individual's pay, a live legal matter or privileged advice is summarized like any other paper. Set an explicit exclusion list before rollout.",{"title":131,"detail":132},"The risk scan is read as legal advice","A flag from the risk scanner is treated as a legal conclusion. Route every flag to the general counsel or company secretary for a human decision.",{"euAiAct":134,"regulations":137,"guidance":141,"controls":142,"incidents":147},{"tier":135,"basis":136},"minimal","An internal assistant that summarizes documents for directors and does not decide on natural persons' access to a service, employment or credit is not listed in Annex III and is not a prohibited practice under Article 5, so it sits at minimal risk beyond the Article 4 AI literacy duty. It would need reassessment if a committee paper's summarization were used to evaluate a named employee's performance, which falls under Annex III point 4(b).",[138,139,140],"eu-ai-act","gdpr","iso-42001",[],[143,144,145,146],"Written policy on which papers, committees and meeting types may be summarized by AI","Exclusion list for privileged, personnel related or otherwise sensitive papers","Page level citation required on every summarized point, checked periodically by the company secretary","Access control for board and committee data aligned with the board portal's existing permissions",[],{"howToBuild":149},"On Blits.ai this is an **AI agent** with a **knowledge base** holding the current and prior board\nand committee packs, ingested from PDF, DOCX and PPTX files, retrieved with **hybrid search** so\nthe agent can compare a new paper with what came before on the same topic. The prompt requires a\npage reference on every summarized point, and **structured output** formats each paper's summary,\ncitation and draft prep questions for the board portal or an internal tool to display.\n\nA separate **agent** configuration runs the risk and exposure scan, so the company secretary or\ngeneral counsel reviews its output on its own, separate from the director facing briefing. Fine grained **role based access control** with per bot roles keeps sensitive committee\npacks, such as remuneration or legal matters, restricted to a separate bot and knowledge base\nwithin the tenant, **PII masking** limits what personal data reaches the model, and **full\nexecution tracing** keeps every summary and its trace for later review. **Test suites** with LLM\nbased grading check summaries against a reference set of papers after every prompt change. The\nplatform is model agnostic and offers EU and UAE data residency.",[151,154,157,160],{"question":152,"answer":153},"Can AI replace reading the board pack?","No. It gives a director a faster way into a paper, with citations back to the source, but the paper stays the record the board is accountable for. Directors who only read the summary can miss a qualification that only appears in the full text.",{"question":155,"answer":156},"Is it safe to put board papers into an AI tool?","Board papers can include commercially sensitive plans, personal data about executives and, at times, legally privileged advice. Set an explicit policy on which papers and committees may use AI summarization before rollout, and keep sensitive papers on a separately configured instance with its own access controls.",{"question":158,"answer":159},"What results have organizations reported?","Published figures are vendor case studies without a stated method. Diligent's case study on Sagic states that directors receive AI generated summaries of 100+ page board packs, and Sagic's chief operating officer, quoted on the same page, describes faster and more confident meeting preparation without giving a number. Diligent's case study on Canadian Light Source says GovernAI's Smart Prep Insights and Smart Summary turned dense board books into concise, actionable briefings, again without a figure. Diligent's Assore Holdings case study lists Smart Summary among its GovernAI features and says board preparation moved from days to minutes, but that figure covers the whole move to Diligent Boards and GovernAI and has no stated method. Treat all three as vendor claims, and track your own preparation time before and after.",{"question":161,"answer":162},"Does summarizing board papers trigger the EU AI Act?","Summarizing documents for directors is not a high risk use under Annex III, so it sits at minimal risk with the general AI literacy duty. It would need reassessment if a paper's summarization were repurposed to evaluate a named employee's performance, which is a separate, high risk use.",[164],"meeting-summarization-and-action-items","2026-10-13",[167],{"date":165,"note":168},"First published","board-and-committee-paper-summarization",[171,202,227],{"title":172,"useCases":173,"organization":174,"vendors":180,"summary":184,"stage":185,"year":186,"channels":187,"languages":188,"metrics":190,"outcomeDisclosed":191,"sources":192,"verification":197,"grade":199,"id":200,"organizationSlug":201},"Canadian Light Source: GovernAI briefings from dense board books",[169],{"name":175,"anonymized":176,"country":177,"region":178,"industry":18,"wikidata":179},"Canadian Light Source",false,"CA","north-america","Q1032188",[181],{"name":182,"role":183},"Diligent","platform","Canadian Light Source (CLS) moved agendas, board books and minutes from binders and email attachments into Diligent Boards, with a Data Room for sharing sensitive material with outside agencies. With GovernAI's Smart Prep Insights and Smart Summary, Diligent reports, dense board books became concise briefings that help directors arrive ready for deeper discussion.","production",2026,[28],[189],"en",[],true,[193],{"url":194,"title":195,"publisher":182,"date":196},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.diligent.com\u002Fresources\u002Fcase-studies\u002Fcanadian-light-source-diligent-boards","A smarter, simpler governance experience for Canadian Light Source with Diligent","2026-01-02",{"level":198,"checkedAt":165},"source-verified","C","canadian-light-source-governai-board-books",null,{"title":203,"useCases":204,"organization":205,"vendors":209,"summary":211,"stage":185,"year":212,"channels":213,"languages":214,"metrics":215,"outcomeDisclosed":191,"sources":216,"verification":225,"grade":199,"id":226,"organizationSlug":201},"Assore Holdings: Smart Summary for dense board materials",[169],{"name":206,"anonymized":176,"country":207,"region":208,"industry":18},"Assore Holdings Proprietary Ltd","ZA","africa",[210],{"name":182,"role":183},"Assore Holdings Proprietary Ltd digitized a paper heavy board process with Diligent Boards and later added GovernAI. Diligent lists Smart Summary, which makes dense board materials more digestible, among the GovernAI features, alongside a Smart Risk Scanner that flags risky language early and Smart Minutes for automated minute taking. Diligent reports that the Group Company Secretary's team moved board preparation from days to minutes.",2025,[28],[189],[],[217,221],{"url":218,"title":219,"publisher":182,"date":220},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.diligent.com\u002Fresources\u002Fcase-studies\u002Fassore-boards-case-study","Assore Holdings Proprietary Ltd uses Diligent Boards & GovernAI to scale international growth","2025-11-07",{"url":222,"title":223,"publisher":224},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.assore.com\u002Fcontact-us","Contact us","Assore",{"level":198,"checkedAt":165},"assore-holdings-governai-smart-summary",{"title":228,"useCases":229,"organization":230,"vendors":234,"summary":236,"stage":237,"year":212,"channels":238,"languages":239,"metrics":240,"outcomeDisclosed":191,"sources":241,"verification":253,"grade":199,"id":255,"organizationSlug":201},"Sagic: AI board pack summaries and prep insights for directors",[169],{"name":231,"anonymized":176,"country":232,"region":233,"industry":19},"The Salvation Army General Insurance Corporation Limited (Sagic)","GB","europe",[235],{"name":182,"role":183},"The Salvation Army General Insurance Corporation Limited (Sagic), a UK insurer majority owned by The Salvation Army Trustee Company, adopted Diligent Boards and GovernAI to prepare directors for meetings. The AI produces summaries of 100+ page board packs and drafts discussion questions for directors, alongside a single portal that centralizes meeting materials, minutes and communications.","pilot",[28],[189],[],[242,246,250],{"url":243,"title":244,"publisher":182,"date":245},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.diligent.com\u002Fresources\u002Fcase-studies\u002Fsagic-case-study","How AI is powering smarter governance for the Salvation Army General Insurance Company","2025-08-29",{"url":247,"title":248,"publisher":249},"https:\u002F\u002Ffind-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk\u002Fcompany\u002F00101071","SALVATION ARMY GENERAL INSURANCE CORPORATION LIMITED (THE): company overview","Companies House",{"url":251,"title":252,"publisher":249},"https:\u002F\u002Ffind-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk\u002Fcompany\u002F00101071\u002Fpersons-with-significant-control","SALVATION ARMY GENERAL INSURANCE CORPORATION LIMITED (THE): persons with significant control",{"level":198,"checkedAt":254},"2026-09-29","sagic-board-pack-summarization",0,[],{"low":259,"high":260},7200,180000,[262,287,312,330],{"slug":164,"title":263,"shortTitle":264,"definition":265,"status":9,"industries":266,"functions":270,"patterns":272,"audience":29,"autonomy":274,"adoptionStage":275,"evidenceCount":49,"publicEvidenceCount":49,"organizations":276,"bestGrade":285,"headline":201,"lastVerified":286,"indexable":191},"AI meeting summarization and action items","Meeting summaries and action items","AI meeting summarization and action items is AI that turns an internal or operational meeting into a summary, decisions and action items with owners and dates. It transcribes a team, project, board or case meeting, online or in person, with the participants' knowledge, for the organizer to check and share. It is the general purpose tool; client advice meetings and sales calls, which feed a regulated record or a sales pipeline, have their own pages.",[18,267,268,269],"government","technology","professional-services",[22,271],"operations",[25,273],"speech-analytics","copilot","mainstream",[277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284],"Cathay Pacific","U.S. Department of Labor","Localiza","Ministry of Justice","Softcat","Trace3","Government Digital Service","University of Manchester","B","2026-09-27",{"slug":288,"title":289,"shortTitle":290,"definition":291,"status":9,"industries":292,"functions":295,"patterns":297,"audience":29,"autonomy":274,"adoptionStage":300,"segment":301,"evidenceCount":302,"publicEvidenceCount":302,"organizations":303,"bestGrade":285,"headline":201,"lastVerified":311,"indexable":191},"policy-drafting-and-gap-analysis","AI for policy drafting and policy gap analysis","Policy drafting and gaps","AI policy drafting and gap analysis is an assistant that reads a new or changed obligation and checks which internal policies it affects, for compliance and legal teams. It finds every policy, standard and procedure the obligation touches, flags clauses that now conflict or are silent, and drafts the updated wording in house style as a redline for the policy owner to approve.",[18,293,19,294,267],"banking","capital-markets",[296,21,22],"regulatory-compliance",[298,299,26,25],"rag-knowledge-assistant","content-generation","emerging","second-line",7,[304,305,306,307,308,309,310],"Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services","Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation","Administration for Children and Families","Health Resources and Services Administration","Office of the Comptroller of the Currency","Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation","Bureau of Consular Affairs","2026-09-26",{"slug":313,"title":314,"shortTitle":315,"definition":316,"status":9,"industries":317,"functions":321,"patterns":322,"audience":29,"autonomy":30,"adoptionStage":31,"segment":39,"evidenceCount":302,"publicEvidenceCount":325,"organizations":326,"bestGrade":285,"headline":201,"lastVerified":286,"indexable":191},"regulatory-horizon-scanning","AI regulatory horizon scanning and obligation mapping","Regulatory horizon scanning","Regulatory horizon scanning is AI that continuously reads publications from the regulators and standard setters an organization answers to and classifies each item by relevance and urgency. It breaks new rules into individual obligations and maps them to the internal policies and controls that meet them, so compliance owners see what changed and where the gaps are.",[18,293,19,318,319,320,267],"payments","wealth-and-asset-management","pharma-and-life-sciences",[296,21,23],[323,26,298,25,324],"classification-and-routing","agentic-workflow",5,[327,328,306,329,308],"Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives","Financial Conduct Authority","Internal Revenue Service",{"slug":331,"title":332,"shortTitle":333,"definition":334,"status":9,"industries":335,"functions":336,"patterns":337,"audience":29,"autonomy":274,"adoptionStage":31,"evidenceCount":338,"publicEvidenceCount":338,"organizations":339,"bestGrade":285,"headline":348,"lastVerified":286,"indexable":191},"legal-research-and-drafting-assistant","AI legal research and drafting assistant for lawyers","Legal research and drafting","A legal research and drafting assistant is a generative AI tool that finds and summarises case law and legislation for lawyers, answering legal questions with citations. It works for lawyers in firms, legal departments and public bodies, also searching internal know how and drafting first versions of memos, briefings, letters and filings, which the lawyer verifies and signs off.",[269,18,267],[21,22],[298,299,25,26],9,[340,341,304,342,343,344,345,346,347],"A&O Shearman","Ashurst Perkins Coie","U.S. Department of Justice","Forvis Mazars in Germany","Macfarlanes","O'Melveny & Myers","Reed Smith","U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission",{"kpi":349,"label":350,"unit":351,"n":64,"nUpTo":256,"kind":352,"value":353,"qualifier":354,"claimant":355,"organization":201,"vendorReported":191},"employee-adoption","Employee adoption","percent","median",80,"exact","vendor",{"indexable":191,"reasons":357},[],[359,365,370,377,384,391,397,403,411,418,425,431,437,444,451,457,463,469,476,481,486,493,499,506,511,516,521,526,532,537,544,550,556,562,568,573],{"id":138,"label":360,"issuer":361,"region":233,"url":362,"description":363,"useCases":364,"indexable":191},"EU AI Act","European Union","https:\u002F\u002Feur-lex.europa.eu\u002Feli\u002Freg\u002F2024\u002F1689\u002Foj","Regulation (EU) 2024\u002F1689: risk based rules for AI systems, with obligations for high risk systems listed in Annex III and transparency duties under Article 50.",275,{"id":139,"label":366,"issuer":361,"region":233,"url":367,"description":368,"useCases":369,"indexable":191},"GDPR","https:\u002F\u002Feur-lex.europa.eu\u002Feli\u002Freg\u002F2016\u002F679\u002Foj","General Data Protection Regulation, including Article 22 on decisions based solely on automated processing.",246,{"id":140,"label":371,"issuer":372,"region":373,"url":374,"description":375,"useCases":376,"indexable":191},"ISO\u002FIEC 42001","ISO and IEC","global","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.iso.org\u002Fstandard\u002F81230.html","The international management system standard for AI.",143,{"id":378,"label":379,"issuer":380,"region":178,"url":381,"description":382,"useCases":383,"indexable":191},"nist-ai-rmf","NIST AI Risk Management Framework","NIST","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.nist.gov\u002Fitl\u002Fai-risk-management-framework","Voluntary US framework to map, measure, manage and govern AI risk, with a generative AI profile.",110,{"id":385,"label":386,"issuer":387,"region":233,"url":388,"description":389,"useCases":390,"indexable":191},"uk-gdpr","UK GDPR","Information Commissioner's Office","https:\u002F\u002Fico.org.uk\u002Ffor-organisations\u002Fuk-gdpr-guidance-and-resources\u002F","The UK's version of the GDPR, including rules on solely automated decisions.",81,{"id":392,"label":393,"issuer":361,"region":233,"url":394,"description":395,"useCases":396,"indexable":191},"dora","DORA","https:\u002F\u002Feur-lex.europa.eu\u002Feli\u002Freg\u002F2022\u002F2554\u002Foj","Digital Operational Resilience Act for financial entities: ICT risk, incident reporting and third party risk, including AI providers.",72,{"id":398,"label":399,"issuer":328,"region":233,"url":400,"description":401,"useCases":402,"indexable":191},"uk-consumer-duty","FCA Consumer Duty","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.fca.org.uk\u002Ffirms\u002Fconsumer-duty","UK rules that require firms to deliver good outcomes for retail customers, including through automated channels.",51,{"id":404,"label":405,"issuer":406,"region":407,"url":408,"description":409,"useCases":410,"indexable":191},"mas-ai-risk-management","MAS AI risk management guidelines","Monetary Authority of Singapore","asia-pacific","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mas.gov.sg\u002Fnews\u002Fmedia-releases\u002F2025\u002Fmas-guidelines-for-artificial-intelligence-risk-management","Singapore's supervisory expectations for AI risk management at financial institutions, building on the FEAT principles.",37,{"id":412,"label":413,"issuer":414,"region":407,"url":415,"description":416,"useCases":417,"indexable":191},"apra-cps-230","APRA CPS 230","Australian Prudential Regulation Authority","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.apra.gov.au\u002Foperational-risk-management","Australian operational risk standard covering critical operations and material service providers.",26,{"id":419,"label":420,"issuer":421,"region":178,"url":422,"description":423,"useCases":424,"indexable":191},"us-sr-11-7","SR 11-7 model risk management","Federal Reserve and OCC","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.federalreserve.gov\u002Fboarddocs\u002Fsrletters\u002F2011\u002Fsr1107.htm","US supervisory guidance on model risk management, applied by banks to AI and machine learning models.",23,{"id":426,"label":427,"issuer":361,"region":233,"url":428,"description":429,"useCases":430,"indexable":191},"nis2","NIS2 Directive","https:\u002F\u002Feur-lex.europa.eu\u002Feli\u002Fdir\u002F2022\u002F2555\u002Foj","Directive (EU) 2022\u002F2555 on cybersecurity for essential and important entities, including telecom networks, energy and public administration.",22,{"id":432,"label":433,"issuer":434,"region":373,"url":435,"description":436,"useCases":430,"indexable":191},"pci-dss","PCI DSS","PCI Security Standards Council","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.pcisecuritystandards.org\u002F","Security standard for any system that stores, processes or transmits cardholder data.",{"id":438,"label":439,"issuer":440,"region":233,"url":441,"description":442,"useCases":443,"indexable":191},"uk-atrs","UK Algorithmic Transparency Recording Standard","UK Government","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.gov.uk\u002Fgovernment\u002Fcollections\u002Falgorithmic-transparency-recording-standard-hub","Mandatory transparency records for algorithmic tools used by UK central government.",18,{"id":445,"label":446,"issuer":447,"region":178,"url":448,"description":449,"useCases":450,"indexable":191},"hipaa","HIPAA","US Department of Health and Human Services","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.hhs.gov\u002Fhipaa\u002Findex.html","US rules for the privacy and security of protected health information.",17,{"id":452,"label":453,"issuer":454,"region":373,"url":455,"description":456,"useCases":50,"indexable":191},"fatf-recommendations","FATF Recommendations","Financial Action Task Force","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.fatf-gafi.org\u002Fen\u002Fpublications\u002FFatfrecommendations\u002FFatf-recommendations.html","Global standards for anti money laundering and counter terrorist financing that national rules implement.",{"id":458,"label":459,"issuer":361,"region":233,"url":460,"description":461,"useCases":462,"indexable":191},"eu-amlr","EU Anti Money Laundering Regulation","https:\u002F\u002Feur-lex.europa.eu\u002Feli\u002Freg\u002F2024\u002F1624\u002Foj","Regulation (EU) 2024\u002F1624: the single EU rulebook for customer due diligence, beneficial ownership and suspicious transaction reporting.",14,{"id":464,"label":465,"issuer":466,"region":178,"url":467,"description":468,"useCases":462,"indexable":191},"us-tcpa","Telephone Consumer Protection Act","Federal Communications Commission","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.fcc.gov\u002Fconsumers\u002Fguides\u002Fstop-unwanted-robocalls-and-texts","US consent rules for automated and prerecorded calls and texts; the FCC has confirmed AI generated voices count as artificial voices.",{"id":470,"label":471,"issuer":472,"region":178,"url":473,"description":474,"useCases":475,"indexable":191},"us-bsa","Bank Secrecy Act","FinCEN","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.fincen.gov\u002Fresources\u002Fstatutes-and-regulations\u002Fbank-secrecy-act","US anti money laundering law: customer due diligence, suspicious activity reports and record keeping.",13,{"id":477,"label":478,"issuer":361,"region":233,"url":479,"description":480,"useCases":475,"indexable":191},"eu-accessibility-act","European Accessibility Act","https:\u002F\u002Feur-lex.europa.eu\u002Feli\u002Fdir\u002F2019\u002F882\u002Foj","Directive (EU) 2019\u002F882: accessibility requirements for banking services, ecommerce and other digital services, applicable since June 2025.",{"id":482,"label":483,"issuer":361,"region":233,"url":484,"description":485,"useCases":475,"indexable":191},"solvency-ii","Solvency II","https:\u002F\u002Feur-lex.europa.eu\u002Feli\u002Fdir\u002F2009\u002F138\u002Foj","Directive 2009\u002F138\u002FEC: risk based capital, governance and model requirements for insurers.",{"id":487,"label":488,"issuer":489,"region":178,"url":490,"description":491,"useCases":492,"indexable":191},"us-ecoa-reg-b","ECOA and Regulation B","Consumer Financial Protection Bureau","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.consumerfinance.gov\u002Frules-policy\u002Fregulations\u002F1002\u002F9\u002F","US fair lending rules, including specific reasons in adverse action notices, which also apply when credit decisions use AI models.",12,{"id":494,"label":495,"issuer":496,"region":373,"url":497,"description":498,"useCases":492,"indexable":191},"telecom-consumer-rules","Telecom consumer protection rules","National telecom regulators","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.berec.europa.eu\u002F","National rules on telecom contracts, switching, billing disputes and marketing consent.",{"id":500,"label":501,"issuer":502,"region":233,"url":503,"description":504,"useCases":505,"indexable":191},"eba-loan-origination","EBA Guidelines on loan origination and monitoring","European Banking Authority","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.eba.europa.eu\u002Fregulation-and-policy\u002Fcredit-risk\u002Fguidelines-on-loan-origination-and-monitoring","Expectations for credit decisioning, including the use of automated models.",11,{"id":507,"label":508,"issuer":361,"region":233,"url":509,"description":510,"useCases":505,"indexable":191},"eecc","European Electronic Communications Code","https:\u002F\u002Feur-lex.europa.eu\u002Feli\u002Fdir\u002F2018\u002F1972\u002Foj","Directive (EU) 2018\u002F1972: consumer protection, contract, switching and security rules for telecom operators.",{"id":512,"label":513,"issuer":361,"region":233,"url":514,"description":515,"useCases":505,"indexable":191},"eu-psd2","PSD2","https:\u002F\u002Feur-lex.europa.eu\u002Feli\u002Fdir\u002F2015\u002F2366\u002Foj","Payment Services Directive 2: strong customer authentication, transaction risk analysis exemptions and open banking access.",{"id":517,"label":518,"issuer":406,"region":407,"url":519,"description":520,"useCases":57,"indexable":191},"mas-notice-626","MAS Notice 626","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mas.gov.sg\u002Fregulation\u002Fnotices\u002Fnotice-626","Singapore's anti money laundering and counter terrorism financing requirements for banks.",{"id":522,"label":523,"issuer":361,"region":233,"url":524,"description":525,"useCases":57,"indexable":191},"mifid-ii","MiFID II","https:\u002F\u002Feur-lex.europa.eu\u002Feli\u002Fdir\u002F2014\u002F65\u002Foj","Directive 2014\u002F65\u002FEU on markets in financial instruments: suitability and appropriateness of advice, record keeping and product governance.",{"id":527,"label":528,"issuer":529,"region":178,"url":530,"description":531,"useCases":49,"indexable":191},"us-fcra","Fair Credit Reporting Act","Federal Trade Commission","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.ftc.gov\u002Flegal-library\u002Fbrowse\u002Fstatutes\u002Ffair-credit-reporting-act","US rules on consumer reports, their accuracy and permissible use, relevant to credit scoring and screening.",{"id":533,"label":534,"issuer":361,"region":233,"url":535,"description":536,"useCases":302,"indexable":191},"eu-idd","Insurance Distribution Directive","https:\u002F\u002Feur-lex.europa.eu\u002Feli\u002Fdir\u002F2016\u002F97\u002Foj","Directive (EU) 2016\u002F97: conduct rules for selling insurance, including demands and needs testing and advice.",{"id":538,"label":539,"issuer":540,"region":541,"url":542,"description":543,"useCases":325,"indexable":191},"cbuae-ai-guidance","CBUAE guidance on AI and ML","Central Bank of the UAE","middle-east","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.centralbank.ae\u002F","UAE central bank expectations for the enabling technologies, AI and machine learning used by licensed financial institutions.",{"id":545,"label":546,"issuer":361,"region":233,"url":547,"description":548,"useCases":549,"indexable":191},"eu-mortgage-credit-directive","EU Mortgage Credit Directive","https:\u002F\u002Feur-lex.europa.eu\u002Feli\u002Fdir\u002F2014\u002F17\u002Foj","Directive 2014\u002F17\u002FEU: creditworthiness assessment, disclosure and advice rules for residential mortgage lending.",4,{"id":551,"label":552,"issuer":553,"region":233,"url":554,"description":555,"useCases":549,"indexable":191},"pra-ss1-23","PRA SS1\u002F23 model risk management","Prudential Regulation Authority","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.bankofengland.co.uk\u002Fprudential-regulation\u002Fpublication\u002F2023\u002Fmay\u002Fmodel-risk-management-principles-for-banks-ss","UK model risk management principles for banks, covering AI and machine learning models.",{"id":557,"label":558,"issuer":559,"region":233,"url":560,"description":561,"useCases":549,"indexable":191},"uk-psr-app-reimbursement","UK APP scam reimbursement rules","Payment Systems Regulator","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.psr.org.uk\u002Four-work\u002Fapp-scams\u002F","Mandatory reimbursement of authorised push payment scam victims by UK payment firms, which shifts scam losses onto banks.",{"id":563,"label":564,"issuer":565,"region":407,"url":566,"description":567,"useCases":64,"indexable":191},"au-scams-prevention-framework","Australian Scams Prevention Framework","Australian Treasury","https:\u002F\u002Ftreasury.gov.au\u002Fconsultation\u002Fc2024-573813","Economy wide obligations for banks, telcos and digital platforms to prevent, detect, disrupt and respond to scams.",{"id":569,"label":570,"issuer":361,"region":233,"url":571,"description":572,"useCases":64,"indexable":191},"eu-mar","EU Market Abuse Regulation","https:\u002F\u002Feur-lex.europa.eu\u002Feli\u002Freg\u002F2014\u002F596\u002Foj","Regulation (EU) 596\u002F2014: insider dealing and market manipulation, including the duty to detect and report suspicious orders and transactions.",{"id":574,"label":575,"issuer":576,"region":178,"url":577,"description":578,"useCases":64,"indexable":191},"nyc-local-law-144","NYC Local Law 144","New York City","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.nyc.gov\u002Fsite\u002Fdca\u002Fabout\u002Fautomated-employment-decision-tools.page","Bias audits and notices for automated employment decision tools used in hiring and promotion in New York City.",1791904356911]